The Making of the Sundanese Peasant Union (SPP), the Biggest Contemporary Agrarian Movement Organization in Java, Indon


Noer Fauzi Rachman*)

 

The Making of the Sundanese Peasant Union (SPP), the Biggest Contemporary Agrarian Movement Organization in Java, Indonesia**)

 

Critical self-consciousness means, historically and politically, the creation of an élite of intellectuals. A human mass does not 'distinguish' itself, does not become independent in its own right without, in the widest sense, organising itself: and there is no organisation without intellectuals, that is without organisers and leaders... But the process of creating intellectuals is long and difficult, full of contradictions, advances and retreats, dispersal and regrouping, in which the loyalty of the masses is often sorely tried."

 (Gramsci 1971:334)

 

Sundanese Peasant Union (SPP) provides an exemplar on the way rural local leaders[1] and urban educated activists[2] able to reorganize dispossessed peasants and to revive agrarian reform politics before and after the Indonesia bureaucratic-authoritarian-military regime downfall in 1998. To understand the ways SPP emerged through the establishment and the situated practices of this nexus, I have been convinced by Gramsci (1971:16) approach to do “a concrete historical analysis of how both organic and traditional intellectuals categories have developed” [3] in the context of trajectory of land struggles in West Java upland, and in that of changing political conjunctures, before and after the fall of authoritarian regime in 1998.

Land Title Do Not Equal Agrarian Reform

 

 Noer Fauzi “Land Title Do Not Equal Agrarian Reform”, Inside Indonesia 98:Oct-Des 2009. https://www.insideindonesia.org/land-titles-do-not-equal-agrarian-reform


In a speech on 31 January 2007 President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono said that agrarian reform would be a priority for his government. Since that time, Indonesia’s National Land Agency (BPN, Badan Pertanahan Nasional) has dramatically increased the rate at which it registers land title. But land rights activists are sharply critical of the government’s policy. Despite, the increase in registrations, we think the BPN has set aside its original agrarian reform goal of redistributing land to the poor. This is a goal that is mandated by Indonesia’s 1960 Basic Agrarian Law, as well as the 2001 legislative Decree No 9, on Agrarian Reform and Natural Resource Management. Providing individual land titles does not necessarily help the poor; in fact it can make the livelihoods of struggling rural people and communities even more precarious.

Accelerated land title registration

Under the leadership of Dr. Joyo Winoto, BPN has pursued a process of ‘legalising’ land assets through accelerating the certification of land titles at an astonishing rate. The volume of government sponsored land ‘legalisation’ has risen sharply. In 2004, before Joyo was appointed,, the BPN issued full legal title for only 269,902 land holdings. By 2008 the total had reached 2,172,507 – an increase of over 800 per cent. Adding cases for which individuals, groups, and businesses paid their own processing fees brings the total to 4,627,039 property titles certified.